Chapter 2. The Impact of Instructor-Structured Guidance on Enhancing Peer Review Effectiveness
Tamilla Mammadova
Abstract
Collaborative learning in higher education takes various forms, including peer review, peer feedback, and peer assessment, all of which play a crucial role in enhancing students’ academic skills. Among these, peer feedback is a widely used approach that fosters literacy development, improves content quality, and facilitates students’ integration into academic communities. By critically evaluating their peers’ work, students develop subject-specific competencies, refine their writing, and strengthen their critical thinking and audience awareness. However, the effectiveness of peer feedback depends on careful instructional design and alignment with course objectives. A well-structured peer review system—incorporating workshops, detailed rubrics, reflection, and guided discussions—enhances students’ abilities as both writers and reviewers. This structured approach promotes a more engaging and supportive learning environment, ultimately enriching the academic writing experience.
About the Contributor
Tamilla Mammadova, an Assistant Professor in Humanities and Social Sciences at ADA University, Azerbaijan, coordinates the Academic Writing and Information Literacy program. Esteemed for her extensive international expertise and scholarly excellence, she holds a PhD from the University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Among her recent book publications is Academic Writing and Information Literacy Instruction in Digital Environment published by Palgrave Macmillan, 2022.
Citation
Mammadova, T. (2026). Normalizing norming: Training your students to be reviewers. In A. E. Dawes & K. Jurns (Eds.), Cultivating confidence in L2 writing: Communicative and peer review practices. Candlin & Mynard. https://doi.org/10.47908/44/2
Collaborative learning in higher education takes various forms, including peer review, peer feedback, and peer assessment, all of which play a crucial role in enhancing students’ academic skills. Among these, peer feedback is a widely used approach that fosters literacy development, improves content quality, and facilitates students’ integration into academic communities. By critically evaluating their peers’ work, students develop subject-specific competencies, refine their writing, and strengthen their critical thinking and audience awareness. However, the effectiveness of peer feedback depends on careful instructional design and alignment with course objectives. A well-structured peer review system—incorporating workshops, detailed rubrics, reflection, and guided discussions—enhances students’ abilities as both writers and reviewers. This structured approach promotes a more engaging and supportive learning environment, ultimately enriching the academic writing experience.
About the Contributor
Tamilla Mammadova, an Assistant Professor in Humanities and Social Sciences at ADA University, Azerbaijan, coordinates the Academic Writing and Information Literacy program. Esteemed for her extensive international expertise and scholarly excellence, she holds a PhD from the University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Among her recent book publications is Academic Writing and Information Literacy Instruction in Digital Environment published by Palgrave Macmillan, 2022.
Citation
Mammadova, T. (2026). Normalizing norming: Training your students to be reviewers. In A. E. Dawes & K. Jurns (Eds.), Cultivating confidence in L2 writing: Communicative and peer review practices. Candlin & Mynard. https://doi.org/10.47908/44/2
Information About the Book
|
Title: Cultivating Confidence in L2 Writing: Communicative and Peer Review Practices
Editors: Edited by Ashton E. Dawes and Kathryn Jurns Publication date: May 2026 Read more... |